Background:Although the use of e-mental health interventions and their evaluation is already well advanced in countries such as the United States and Australia, research in this area is still in the early stages in Germany. Moreover, existing programs are used only to a small extent by patients, although physicians and therapists generally have a positive attitude toward their use. To help promote the use of online interventions in the future, an analysis of the differences in opinions and attitudes toward e-mental health interventions between health care professionals and nonprofessionals is necessary.Objective:This study aimed to examine the differences in attitudes toward online interventions between health care professionals and nonprofessionals.Methods:This study examined 92 physicians, 36 psychotherapists, and 1,353 randomly recruited nonprofessionals with the eight-item questionnaire entitled "Attitudes on telemedicine in psychiatry and psychotherapy (ATiPP)."Results:The questionnaires of n = 62 physicians, n = 37 psychotherapists, and n = 1,353 nonprofessionals were included in the analysis. Overall, nonprofessionals rate the use of telemedicine more critically than professionals. The itemwise t tests show significant differences between health care professionals and nonprofessionals on six out of eight items. The analyses of variance with post hoc tests for each single item also found differences between the groups (physicians vs. therapists vs. telephone participants vs. practice sample).Conclusion:There are significant differences in attitudes toward online interventions between professionals and nonprofessionals.
Attitude of Health Personnel , Internet-Based Intervention , Psychiatry , Psychotherapy , Public Opinion , Telemedicine , Adult , Female , Germany , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Surveys and Questionnaires
BACKGROUND: In the field of psychiatry and psychotherapy, there are now a growing number of Web-based interventions, mobile phone apps, or treatments that are available via remote transmission screen worldwide. Many of these interventions have been shown to be effective in studies but still find little use in everyday therapeutic work. However, it is important that attitude and expectation toward this treatment are generally examined, because these factors have an important effect on the efficacy of the treatment. To measure the general attitude of the users and prescribers toward telemedicine, which may include, for instance, Web-based interventions or interventions through mobile phone apps, there are a small number of extensive tests. The results of studies based on small groups of patients have been published too, but there is no useful short screening tool to give an insight into the general population's attitude. We have developed a screening instrument that examines such attitude through a few graded questions. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to explore the Attitude toward Telemedicine in Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (ATiPP) and to evaluate the results of general population and some subgroups. METHODS: In a three-step process, the questionnaire, which is available in three versions (laypeople, physicians, and psychologists), was developed. Afterwards, it was evaluated by four groups: population-representative laypeople, outpatients in different faculties, physicians, and psychotherapists. RESULTS: The results were evaluated from a total of 1554 questionnaires. The sample population included 1000 laypeople, 455 outpatients, 62 physicians, and 37 psychotherapists. The reliability of all three versions of the questionnaire seemed good, as indicated by the Cronbach alpha values of .849 (the laypeople group), .80 (the outpatients' group), .827 (the physicians' group), and .855 (the psychotherapists' group). CONCLUSIONS: The ATiPP was found to be useful and reliable for measuring the attitudes toward the Web-based interventions in psychiatry and psychotherapy and should be used in different studies in this field in the future to evaluate and reflect the attitude of the participants.
